I was SOOO wrong about rates…. BUT it is such good news for home purchases and refinances.
In both my blogging and personal conversations with borrowers, realtors and other business partners, I have been very measured in my comments on where rates could be in the future. Because rates spiked last year just before the holiday season and took eight months to grind down to the same levels again, I was very hesitant to say that I thought rates would stay low as we came to into November. I was SOOOO wrong about that view on rates. Not only have we had record rates as we throughout the Fall, but rates have actually stayed low as Thanksgiving has passed on by.
As you can see from the graph below, rates (as measured by the Weekly Primary Mortgage Market Survey done by Freddie Mac) were very attractive throughout the summer of 2010 but spiked up the week before Thanksgiving. In my opinion, this was largely due to mortgage-backed investors and therefore banks raising rates so that investors could clean-up their balance sheets before year-end and banks could close the loans in their pipeline by December 31. Folks who had an opportunity at a 4.125% rate but wanted to wait until rates were at 4.000%. By December, 30 Year Fixed Rates were at 4.860%.
I thought that the same thing would happen this year…..It is obvious that I was completely wrong!!! If you look where rates are today hovering around 4.000% two weeks after Turkey Day, it makes you wonder if there will be an uptick of rates by year-end. Why are we so fortunate? We should send a special thanks to the European Union. From the Greek (or was it Italian) debt crisis to the threatened down grade of fifteen (15) European countries by Standard & Poor’s today, there has been nothing but bad news about European sovereign debt and banks. Because Europe has not found a solution to its debt problems, investors have continued to take a flight to quality by buying treasury bonds and mortgage-backed securities. That has kept mortgage rates low up until now and will likely keep rates low into the New Year as it seems unlikely that Europe will solve its problems before then.
What has Uncle Sam done to Aunt Fannie and Uncle Freddie that will raise the cost of borrowing…now really is the time to refinance or purchase a home
As we all know, the last thing you can do in your blog is create a call to action. “You need to refinance NOW or you must buy a home TODAY” sound like something from a used car salesman. Especially since you cannot predict when rates will be at their lowest and you cannot guarantee when housing prices bottom out. You cannot time markets: not the stock market, interest rates or the real estate markets.
However, there is a new reason that unfortunately is making now the time to refinance or buy a home. It is not the usual unpredictable factors such as interest rates, the economy, the job market, real estate values, availability of financing or any of the usual suspects. For the first time there is a real impetus to act NOW to refinance or buy a home.
It is the government!!!!!
In the aftermath of the financial crisis, the enormous number of foreclosures and the cost of supporting the mortgage market, Uncle Sam is going to raise the cost of borrowing by regulating the size of down payments and the fees charged by Aunt Fannie Mae, Uncle Freddie and the FHA. The White House and both Democrats and Republicans are all on board to make changes to the mortgage market, and the cost of getting a loan is going to increase for everyone.
So let’s take a step back and chat a bit about Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. We all have heard the names of these government sponsored entities (GSEs), but what do they do? Before the financial crisis, Aunt Fannie and Uncle Freddie would buy mortgages that conformed to their standards (conforming loans!) and sell bonds that where backed by pools of the mortgages (mortgage-backed securities). The key was that Fannie and Freddie would put a full guarantee on the payments of the bonds. Because Fannie and Freddie were government entities, the markets felt that Uncle Sam would bail them out if something went wrong. This let Fannie and Freddie buy loans with very low down payments and loose credit standards. When the financial crisis hit, people realized that it was all smoke and mirrors, and Uncle Sam had to buy Aunt Fannie and Uncle Freddie.
Now, if that seemed like a bit too much to soak in. Here is the bottom line:
Fannie and Freddie made mortgages cheap for everyone. They did it with smoke and mirrors, and now the game is over! To make the market work without the magic, Fannie and Freddie are going to have to take less risk and charge more for the risk they take.
“The price of mortgage money is going to go up, and the availability of mortgage money may also be impinged,” says Keith Gumbinger, vice president at HSH Associates, which tracks mortgage data. Here are some arguments why the cost of a mortgage is going up.
Less Risk
Fannie and Freddie are adding new fees to loans to people with the best credit and raising existing loan fees. Freddie’s new fees start March 1, while Fannie’s kick in April 1.
Neither Fannie nor Freddie have been assessing fees on most loans for borrowers with credit scores above 720, even if the down payment was small. But citing a need to address risk and price their services appropriately, they will assess a fee of 0.25% to 0.5% of the loan value on borrowers with credit scores of 720 or higher who put down less than 25% of the purchase amount. The current fee for those with credit scores of 700 to 719 who put down less than 20% of the purchase price will double to a full percentage point of the loan value from half a point.
In addition, the Federal Housing Administration, saying it needs to bolster its capital reserves, is raising its required annual mortgage-insurance premium for FHA loans by 0.25% of the loan value. As a result, FHA loans—which are aimed at first-time home buyers and those with moderate incomes—will include an upfront mortgage insurance payment of 1% of the loan amount and an annual premium of 1.1% to 1.15% when the increase goes into effect on April 18.
For regular loans, private mortgage insurance—which is required when you put down less than 20% of the home’s value—is tougher to get than it once was. Generally, it is available only for buyers who make a down payment of at least 5% and have a credit score of 700 or higher.
More Restrictions
Earlier this month, the Obama administration proposed a wide-ranging overhaul of the mortgage market, including phasing out Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, requiring a down payment of at least 10% and reducing the share of FHA loans, which are almost 30% of the market now, up from a historical market share of 10% to 15%.
Richard Peek, president of the Florida Association of Mortgage Professionals, says much of his business right now is in FHA loans, which allow down payments of as little as 3.5%. Requiring a 10% down payment, he says, would put homes out of reach for many Florida customers.
Privatization of Fannie & Freddie
Remember, both Fannie and Freddie are owned by the US government. As described above, both the Administration and both parties in Congress are aiming toward making Fannie and Freddie into private companies or creating a new private company to take their place (called privatization). This could have a serious impact on the accessibility and cost of a mortgage.
The Administration has put forth a number of possible options. The first of those would put the vast majority of the mortgage market in the hands of the private sector, where lenders would originate mortgages and securitize them without any government backing. The middleman role currently played by Fannie and Freddie would no longer exist.
The government’s role would be limited to the FHA and a few other smaller housing agencies, and their reach would be sharply reduced from current levels. The FHA backed 20% of all new mortgages last year. This is a truly private market
The second option, championed by a handful of economists, would also create a mostly private market with a limited government backstop that would primarily become active buying or guaranteeing loans in periods when private lenders retreated during financial shocks.
The third option would create new privately owned companies to buy mortgages from banks and sell them as securities. Those securities would be explicitly guaranteed by the government as long as they meet certain criteria. The government would collect fees for that backing, just as the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. insures bank deposits and regulates banks.
“The cost of mortgages is probably going to go up, and homeownership is probably going to go down,” said Daniel Mudd, the former chief executive of Fannie Mae who is now CEO of Fortress Investment Group.
Both of those things arguably could be a good thing for banks, but what about the consumer????????????????
Administration officials said the process of transitioning to a post-Fannie and Freddie world would take at least five to seven years, in part because the housing market remains too fragile. Many analysts say the process, which includes dismantling, moving, or resembling the firms’ infrastructure, could take even longer.
But in this politically charged environment with a Presidential election looming in 2012, it is hard to tell when changes will occur. Both parties have blamed the financial crisis largely on Fannie and Freddie, so Democrats and Republicans have a lot to gain by beating the drum on privatization and reform. With banks being so skittish now, nothing will prevent them from raising rates today to cover any perceived loss of profitability in the future.
RATES UP 1% and PROPERTY VALUES DOWN 10%
Mortgage rates could be one percentage point higher and house prices 10% lower if the U.S. mortgage market were fully privatized, according to a paper to be released Tuesday by Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics.
Mr. Zandi argues that a purely public market risks putting too much risk on taxpayers because policy makers would be tempted to subsidize homeownership by setting mortgage-insurance fees too low.
A purely private market won’t work either, he says, because investors will assume that the U.S. government will intervene in a crisis. “No matter how much you talk about ‘no government backstop,’ when push comes to shove, the government will step in,” says Mr. Zandi.
Moreover, lenders would be likely to retreat or demand higher rates during financial shocks, exacerbating downturns. And lenders would be much less likely to offer 30-year fixed-rate loans at attractive rates, leading the majority of homeowners to opt for adjustable-rate mortgages. “I could be wrong, but I’m not sure it’s worth taking the chance,” says Mr. Zandi.
Because of the increase in rates, fewer people will have access to mortgage loans. With fewer buyers in the market to purchase homes, real estate prices will fall. In addition, a private company will need a lot more capital (that is cash) to run as Fannie and Freddie once did. The more cash that a company has to put towards making the mortgage, the more capital that the borrower will have to put down to get the mortgage. Consumers put their “capital” into a mortgage by making a cash down payment.
In simple terms: the more capital required by a private company to make mortgages, the larger of a down payment you will need to make. This again will limit access to mortgages. If you combine the decrease of borrowers from higher rates and down payment, you can see how there will be much less demand for real estate and prices could seriously tumble.
Bottom Line: As I have said time and time again, you cannot predict when rates will be at their lowest or at their highest. Neither can you predict when real estate market will hit bottom or begin to rise again. However, you can say that the government will only make it more expensive to refinance your mortgage or buy a new home.
Because of good old Uncle Sam, now is the time to act!!!!
It’s high noon at the OK Corral for home buyers. Sellers have dropped their guns (and their prices) to attract buyers!
Home values are falling at an accelerating rate in many cities across the U.S.
The Wall Street Journal’s latest quarterly survey of housing-market conditions found that prices declined in all the 28 major metropolitan areas tracked during the fourth quarter when compared to a year earlier.
Home values dropped the most in cities that have already been hard-hit by the housing bust, including Miami, Orlando, Atlanta, and Chicago, according to data from real-estate website Zillow.com. But price declines also intensified in several markets that so far have escaped the brunt of the downturn, including Seattle and Portland, Ore.
Blog Comments